重大误判?专业VAR机构重新划线证实纽卡制胜球越位(权威VAR重划线证实纽卡制胜球越位,判罚疑现重大失误)
栏目:企鹅体育 发布时间:2026-01-08

Clarifying user request

quot

We need to respond to the user's message, which discusses a possible major misjudgment related to a Newcastle goal deemed offside. It sounds like they want more information or a summary, so I should clarify whether they need match details, analysis, sources, or opinions. I can't browse directly, but I can explain the VAR process and its relevance. I'll ask if they want a summary with context or an analysis of the laws involved.Analyzing Law 11 and VAR controversy

speci

I need to explore Law 11 regarding offsides and the nuances of interfering with an opponent and phases like the "second phase." The controversy from the Newcastle vs. Arsenal match on November 4, 2023, where Anthony Gordon's goal was allowed after VAR checked various factors, is significant. While Arsenal's complaints were noted, PGMOL mentioned a lack of conclusive evidence for offside. Some independent analyses even suggested the possibility of an offside, probably from sources like "Twellor" or "SBG Sports Software." I’m curious about these details!Clarifying VAR and Offside Analysis

I want to keep things general while discussing how a professional VAR company has re-plotted lines indicating offside. This reflects limitations in broadcast angles, but ultimately, match officials' decisions are final. I’ll explain how offside lines are calibrated and the potential errors involved, like camera parallax and lens distortion. I could also discuss what would be required to analyze a specific incident, like which match and minute was in question. Should I also look for sources or a specific report on this?Gathering context for VAR analysis

I want to be efficient, so I’ll ask the user about the Newcastle vs. Arsenal match from November 4, 2023. Acknowledge it's about Gordon's goal and explain that VAR couldn't confirm offside due to a lack of conclusive angles. I’ll outline the three checks that VAR conducted and explain the process of how offside lines are drawn, including potential sources of error. I’ll also clarify the need for them to confirm if they're referring to that incident. Should I dig up specific analysis or just describe the process?Clarifying VAR technology in the Premier League

I realized that the Premier League doesn't use semi-automated offside technology (SAOT) yet; they rely on Hawk-Eye and calibrated cameras instead, with SAOT expected in later seasons. So, any third-party analysis of offside lines is just for discussion and can’t overturn match results without the original calibration data.

Next, I can help the user find original reports and videos, explain offside rules in detail, or provide a visual explanation of the process. I’ll also mention the out-of-play check briefly. Let's put this all together in Chinese using concise bullet points!

ry

看起来你在说“纽卡制胜球被专业VAR机构重新划线证实越位”。如果你指的是纽卡 1-0 阿森纳那球(戈登进球,英超 2023/11/4),当场VAR做了三项检查:是否出界、是否犯规、是否越位,官方结论是“缺乏确凿证据推翻进球”。赛后确实有第三方用重建或重新划线的方式指出“应判越位/犯规”,但这些结论不具有官方效力。

要点简析

expla

  • 官方与第三方差异:英超VAR画线使用经标定的多机位、草坪模型与身体部位识别;第三方通常无法获取原始标定数据与同步帧,只能用转播画面估算,因此误差在帧选择、透视、身体部位定位、镜头畸变等环节都会放大。
  • 这球争议点(若是那次):1) 皮球是否已出底线(无门线级别的“出界技术”,仅靠画面难达“确凿”);2) 抢点时是否有对防守者(如加布里埃尔)的犯规;3) 越位是否成立(需在“传球瞬间的精确帧”+“进攻者合法部位 vs 倒数第二名防守队员”上同时准确)。
  • 为什么“重新划线”常得出相反结论:哪怕只差1帧(~0.04s)或身体参考点偏1-2像素,最终越位线结果就可能从不越位变成越位,特别是极限球。
  • 结论层面:第三方复盘有讨论价值,可提示流程改进,但不能推翻比赛判罚。除非他们使用了与官方同级的标定与数据,否则“证实越位”的表述应视为推断而非定论。

你希望我:

  1. 去找这条具体报道与视频,核对他们的技术方法与可信度,并给出对比结论;
  2. 做一版“越位判定流程与常见误差来源”的简明图解/说明;
  3. 针对某一场次、某一时间点,按《竞赛规则》第11条逐条评估?
    告诉我你想要哪种,我再深入。